ABSTRACT
Introduction: Increasing evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of universal masking precautions in reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Whether these precautions have an impact on surgical site infections (SSI), currently remains unknown. This study assesses whether implementation of universal masking precautions altered the rates of SSI. Method(s): We performed a single-institution, retrospective cohort study using the NSQIP database, evaluating all patients undergoing most performed general surgery procedures from June 2018 to December 2021. SSI rates were compared between patients who underwent operation before and after implementation of universal masking precautions at our institution in March 2020. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test. Result(s): A total of 1,539 patients were included;721 patients were in the pre-masking cohort, while 818 in post-masking cohort. During this time period, a total of 143 (9.3%) patients developed SSI, 3.6% incisional and 5.7% deep organ space infections (OSI) (p=0.6601). Incisional and OSI rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (incisional 3.47% vs 3.67%, p=0.891;OSI 5.41% vs 5.99%, p=0.6608). Sub-analysis of top 5 procedures (by volume - laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, thromboendarterectomy, colectomy with anastomosis, and colectomy with ileocolostomy) demonstrated a significant decrease in incisional infections (3.7% vs 1.62%, p=0.0354). Conclusion(s): While the incidence of SSI did not differ significantly in the overall cohort after implementation of universal masking precautions, there was a decrease in incisional infections in commonly performed procedures at our institution. Future research is needed to identify whether continued masking precautions may minimize the risk of SSI in specific patient populations.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Enhanced recovery after operation and surgical site infection (SSI) bundles have been implemented in hospital systems nationwide to mitigate complications after colorectal operation. These quality improvement bundles (QIB) aim to improve patient safety and should decrease healthcare costs. This study identifies the impact of QIB on SSI rate and hospital costs. Method(s): Vizient and SSI reporting data was queried from 2016- 2021, for all colorectal resections tracked by the National Healthcare Safety Network across the enterprise. The operations were linked to a financial database. Data was analyzed quarterly to identify a relationship between SSI rate, hospital cost, and implementation of SSI mitigation elements. Result(s): 4,163 patients were identified during the study period. SSIs peaked in quarter 2 of 2018 at 5.3%, after which SSI mitigation efforts were announced. A steady decrease is seen in SSI rates, until quarter 3 of 2020, when our hospital system experienced its first COVID wave. With adjustment for procedure type, hospital costs increased by 15.8% per case from 2018-Q3 forward on average with the sharpest elevation observed in quarter 3 of 2019, due to medication startup costs for our SSI bundle. Conclusion(s): We successfully reduced colon SSIs with implementation of an ERAS bundle but incurred 16% greater costs compared with pre implementation, especially during the early implementation period.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Examine the effect of COVID-19 on chronic wound care service provision for Medicare beneficiaries in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Method(s): This retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data included beneficiaries who received care for diabetic foot ulcers and infections, arterial ulcers;skin disorders and infections, surgical wounds and infections;traumatic wounds;venous ulcers and infections, unspecified chronic ulcers, and others. We extracted all claims for each targeted beneficiary across all care settings and from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File for 2019 to 2021. The outcomes were: 1) prevalence of each wound type, 2) Medicare expenditures by wound type, and expenditures by type of service. Result(s): Over the 3-year period, the number of Medicare beneficiaries with a wound generally decreased in 2020, then increased in 2021 to a higher level than in 2019. In 2019, 16.4% of Medicare beneficiaries (10.6M) had at least one type of wound. In 2020, 14.9% of Medicare beneficiaries (9.8M) were diagnosed with wounds (a decrease of 7.1%), and in 2021, 16.1% of Medicare beneficiaries (10.8M) were diagnosed with wounds, an increase of 1.9% from 2019. In 2021, approximately 2.7% of beneficiaries had a claim with a wound diagnosis that had been added in FY2020, or 0.4% of all Medicare beneficiaries. The prevalence of COVID-19 among beneficiaries with chronic wounds was 896,198 (9.1%) in 2020, rising to 1.2M (11.1%) in 2021. Using our mid-range estimates of Medicare expenditures, wound care totaled $24.7B in 2019, $23.9B in 2020, and $26.3B in 2021. Conclusion(s): These results emphasize the ongoing prevalence of chronic wounds among Medicare beneficiaries and suggest the decrease in care during the pandemic contributed to a relative increase in care and expenditures in 2021. We found a shift in the site of care from skilled nursing facilities toward home health as individuals sought to avoid COVID-19 exposure.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study Surgical site infections (SSI) burden U.S. hospitals with around $1.5 billion annually. To reduce SSI, irrigating the incision with an antimicrobial solution before closure is recommended. Hence, we evaluate the impact of Irrisept, a form of diluted chlorohexidine 0.05%, on reducing the prevalence of SSI in a high-risk breast cosmetic surgery population. Methods Used We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data in the electronic medical record for breast implant exchange patients in one practice and analyzed infection rates between 42 patients from July 2018-June 2019 that did not receive Irrisept irrigation (control group) with 16 patients from July 2019-July2020 that received Irrisept irrigation (experimental group;significantly less due to Covid-19). We executed descriptive analyses, independent T test, ANOVA (for 3 types of incision location), and Chi-squared to assess comorbidities and intraoperative factors. Summary of Results Among the control group (n=42), 4 patients had a postoperative infection;in the experimental group (n=16), 0 had an infection (9.52% vs. 0%;p=0.04) suggesting the use of Irrisept significantly decreases SSI. The p values from the T test and ANOVA (p<0.05=significant) showed no significant differences in breast cancer (0.84), previous radiation (0.32), history of chemotherapy (0.57), obesity (0.40), renal failure (0.32), smoker/previous smoker (0.41), type of implant (0.32), incision location (0.68), acellular dermal matrix use (0.32), or drain use (0.58) between two groups. The only significant comorbidity was diabetes (p=0.04) with 9.52% (control) vs. 0% (experimental). However, greater percentage of experimental group were obese (25% vs.14.29%) and had a history of smoking (25% vs. 9.52%). Conclusions A concern regarding the implementation of Irrisept irrigation is associated costs. However, the results show the use of Irrisept decreases the infection rates, ultimately relieving the financial burden of postoperative infections. Therefore, we recommend irrigating the incisions of breast surgery patients with Irrisept as both a preventative and economic measure.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Various diversion techniques exist for the management of neurogenic bladders. In pediatrics, the appendicovesicostomy is a successful approach but may not be applicable for all patients. An alternative is the Yang-Monti ("Monti") catheterizable conduit, created using a section of small bowel. Although commonly used in pediatrics, there are very few series evaluating adults. This study aims to evaluate "Monti" outcomes in an adult population. METHOD(S): Between 1999 and 2022, "Monti" procedures at a single institution were identified using CPT codes, and the list was reviewed to select for adult patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Preoperative data included indications for surgery and patient demographics. Perioperative (day 0 to end of hospital stay) data included time to return of bowel function, length of stay, and perioperative complications. Long-term complications included infections, hospital admissions, and reoperations. Data are presented as means or percentages. RESULT(S): 21 adult patients (male n=8;female n=13) with neurogenic bladder dysfunction were identified. 14 patients developed neurogenic bladder secondary to trauma, while other indications for surgery included idiopathic urinary retention (n=1), tumors (n=2), congenital abnormalities (n=2), multiple sclerosis (n=1), and autoimmune neuropathy (n=1). The mean follow-up time was 3.13 years and mean age at surgery was 35.5 years. The mean time to return of bowel function was 2.7 days (n=14) and postoperative hospital stay was 4.3 days (n=16). Perioperative complications occurred in 10 patients (47.6%) in the first 30 days including UTIs (n=3), surgical site infection (n=3), ileus (n=1), small bowel obstruction (n=1), and suprapubic tube related complications (n=3). Five emergency room admissions for urologic concerns occurred within this period with a total of 28 visits overall. At six month follow-up, a total of six (28.6%) patients had longer-term complications. These included a takedown, a scheduled revision, a hospitalization for complicated UTI, and three patients who were unable to catheterize. Overall, nine patients (42.9%) required reoperation, including three revisions and one cystectomy with conversion to ileal conduit. Two patients expired during the course of this study due to COVID pneumonia and suspected sepsis. CONCLUSION(S): "Monti" procedures are useful for adult patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. However, these procedures are associated with significant complications. This information should be used to aid in presurgical counseling.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 has changed medical practice nowadays. One of the biggest concerns has been establishing when invasive procedures such as surgery, GI endoscopy or bone marrow transplant are safe;and if it is necessary to consider screening for asymptomatic patients. Method(s): We identified asymptomatic patients that were scheduled for invasive procedures from May 2020 to April 2021 at Clinica de Marly. Patients were asked to fill a questionnaire about GI and upper respiratory symptoms and contact with possible/confirmed cases of COVID- 19 in the last 15 days. Patients taken to emergency procedures, who had symptoms or contact with probable/confirmed cases in the last 15 days were excluded. rt-PCR was performed to screen COVID-19. Result(s): A total of 1837 patients were included. 104 rt-PCRs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, leading to a 5.66% of identified asymptomatic patients. Patients were followed-up on the 30th day after the procedure. 1733 negative patients responded to our follow-up, in which only 1 death and 2 complications were detected. 102 positive patients were followed-up and no complications or deaths were reported. Conclusion(s): We found the presence of 5.66% of asymptomatic patients with positive rt-PCR for COVID-19. Safe screening will decide if these invasive interventions can be postponed, or, if the benefit outweighs the risks.Copyright © 2022 Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the clinical evaluation effects of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk assessment scale on preoperative and surgical risk of liver transplantation during the COVID-19 outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 6 liver transplant recipients who were admitted to Southern Theater Command General Hospital of PLA between January 20 and March 27, 2020 were collected. There were 5 males and 1 female, aged from 42.0 to 62.0 years, with a median age of 53.0 years. There were 6 donors including 5 males and 1 female, aged from 24.0 to 60.0 years, with a median age of 41.5 years. All the donor livers were obtained through the China Organ Transplant Response System. Liver transplantation was performed in the fixed negative pressure operating room, and secondary protective measures were adopted for low-risk donors. Classic orthotopic liver transplantation or Piggyback liver transplantation was performed according to the specific situations of the recipients. Medical staffs in the ward were exposed to the secondary protective measures, and the three-grade protective measures were adopted for medical staffs when the liver transplant recipients had fever or suspected infection. Observation indicators: (1) risk assessment of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients;(2) risk assessment of COVID-19 on medical staffs of liver transplantation;(3) treatment situations of liver transplant recipients;(4) postoperative situations of liver transplant recipients;(5) follow-up of liver transplant recipients;(6) infection of medical staffs of liver transplantation. Follow-up was performed using outpatient examination or telephone interview to detect whether liver transplant recipients had suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection up to March 2020. Medical staffs who were involved in organ acquisition, transplantation surgery and ward management were followed up to detect whether they had suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection within 14 days. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean+/-SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers. Result(s): (1) Risk assessment of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients: all the 6 recipients and their related families were confirmed no contact with suspected COVID-19 patients or travel history in the epidemic area within 14 days. Of the 6 recipients, 1 was diagnosed with fever with body temperature of 38.1 and was tested negative for chest computer tomography (CT) examination and nucleic acid test for COVID-19;1 was diagnosed with fever and hypoxemia with body temperature of 38.5 and was tested negative for nucleic acid test for COVID-19, and the results of chest CT examination showed large amount of pleural effusion in both lungs without invasive pneumonia;other 4 recipients had no clinical symptoms of COVID-19 with negative results of chest CT examination and nucleic acid test for COVID-19. Five of the 6 recipients had no history of contact with COVID-19 patients and 1 recipient had treatment history at hospital of risk level 1. The preoperative risk level of COVID-19 was low in all the 6 liver transplant recipients. (2) Risk assessment of COVID-19 on medical staffs of liver transplantation: of the 6 recipients, 5 had the waiting hospital of risk level 0 and 1 had the waiting hospital of risk level 1. Six recipients had the transplant hospital of risk level 0. (3) Treatment situations of liver transplant recipients: of the 6 recipients, 2 underwent classic orthotopic liver transplantation and 4 underwent piggyback liver transplantation. The cold ischemia time of liver, time of anhepatic phase, volume of intraoperative blood loss, operation time, treatment time at intensive care unit of the 6 recipients were (5.9+/-2.4)hours, (49+/-14)minutes, 1 500 mL(range, 800-1 800 mL), (8.9+/-2.1)hours, 2 days(range, 1-4 days), respectively. Of the 6 recipients, 2 required adjustment of the immunosuppression progr m, and 4 did not change the immunosuppression program. (4) Postoperative situations of liver transplant recipients: of the 6 recipients, 5 had no postoperative serious infection and 1 had postoperative serious infection. The 5 recipients without postoperative serious infection had the range of the highest temperature as 37.8-38.5 , and returned to normal temperature within postoperative 3 days. All of the 5 recipients who had no postoperative serious infection received chest CT examination with no obvious manifestation of viral pneumonia and were tested negative for nucleic acid test for COVID-19 at 1 week postoperatively, and then were discharged from hospital. One recipient who had postoperative serious infection had gastrointestinal fistula and repeated fever at postoperative 7 days with the highest temperature as 39.2 . This recipient had body temperature returned to normal and good function of the graft after treatment in the isolation ward with active drainage, and was transferred back to local hospital for further rehabilitation treatment. The duration of hospital stay of the 6 recipients were 30 days(range, 15-74 days). (5) Follow-up of liver transplant recipients: all the 6 recipients were followed up for 31.5 days(range, 12.0-64.0 days) with the normal body temperature, and they had negative results of viral pneumonia for chest CT examination and nucleic acid test for COVID-19. (6) Infection of medical staffs of liver transplantation: surgeons, nurses, anesthetists, medical staffs at ICU and medical staffs at liver transplantation center who participated in liver transplantation had good health within postoperative 14 days, without suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 risk assessment scale has good safety for liver transplant recipients during the COVID-19 outbreak. It is suggested that organ transplantation can be carried out in low-risk recipients and cautiously carried out in recipients of uncertain risk, but organ transplantation should not be carried out in high-risk recipients.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the clinical evaluation effects of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk assessment scale on preoperative and surgical risk of liver transplantation during the COVID-19 outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 6 liver transplant recipients who were admitted to Southern Theater Command General Hospital of PLA between January 20 and March 27, 2020 were collected. There were 5 males and 1 female, aged from 42.0 to 62.0 years, with a median age of 53.0 years. There were 6 donors including 5 males and 1 female, aged from 24.0 to 60.0 years, with a median age of 41.5 years. All the donor livers were obtained through the China Organ Transplant Response System. Liver transplantation was performed in the fixed negative pressure operating room, and secondary protective measures were adopted for low-risk donors. Classic orthotopic liver transplantation or Piggyback liver transplantation was performed according to the specific situations of the recipients. Medical staffs in the ward were exposed to the secondary protective measures, and the three-grade protective measures were adopted for medical staffs when the liver transplant recipients had fever or suspected infection. Observation indicators: (1) risk assessment of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients;(2) risk assessment of COVID-19 on medical staffs of liver transplantation;(3) treatment situations of liver transplant recipients;(4) postoperative situations of liver transplant recipients;(5) follow-up of liver transplant recipients;(6) infection of medical staffs of liver transplantation. Follow-up was performed using outpatient examination or telephone interview to detect whether liver transplant recipients had suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection up to March 2020. Medical staffs who were involved in organ acquisition, transplantation surgery and ward management were followed up to detect whether they had suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection within 14 days. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean+/-SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers. Result(s): (1) Risk assessment of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients: all the 6 recipients and their related families were confirmed no contact with suspected COVID-19 patients or travel history in the epidemic area within 14 days. Of the 6 recipients, 1 was diagnosed with fever with body temperature of 38.1 and was tested negative for chest computer tomography (CT) examination and nucleic acid test for COVID-19;1 was diagnosed with fever and hypoxemia with body temperature of 38.5 and was tested negative for nucleic acid test for COVID-19, and the results of chest CT examination showed large amount of pleural effusion in both lungs without invasive pneumonia;other 4 recipients had no clinical symptoms of COVID-19 with negative results of chest CT examination and nucleic acid test for COVID-19. Five of the 6 recipients had no history of contact with COVID-19 patients and 1 recipient had treatment history at hospital of risk level 1. The preoperative risk level of COVID-19 was low in all the 6 liver transplant recipients. (2) Risk assessment of COVID-19 on medical staffs of liver transplantation: of the 6 recipients, 5 had the waiting hospital of risk level 0 and 1 had the waiting hospital of risk level 1. Six recipients had the transplant hospital of risk level 0. (3) Treatment situations of liver transplant recipients: of the 6 recipients, 2 underwent classic orthotopic liver transplantation and 4 underwent piggyback liver transplantation. The cold ischemia time of liver, time of anhepatic phase, volume of intraoperative blood loss, operation time, treatment time at intensive care unit of the 6 recipients were (5.9+/-2.4)hours, (49+/-14)minutes, 1 500 mL(range, 800-1 800 mL), (8.9+/-2.1)hours, 2 days(range, 1-4 days), respectively. Of the 6 recipients, 2 required adjustment of the immunosuppression progr m, and 4 did not change the immunosuppression program. (4) Postoperative situations of liver transplant recipients: of the 6 recipients, 5 had no postoperative serious infection and 1 had postoperative serious infection. The 5 recipients without postoperative serious infection had the range of the highest temperature as 37.8-38.5 , and returned to normal temperature within postoperative 3 days. All of the 5 recipients who had no postoperative serious infection received chest CT examination with no obvious manifestation of viral pneumonia and were tested negative for nucleic acid test for COVID-19 at 1 week postoperatively, and then were discharged from hospital. One recipient who had postoperative serious infection had gastrointestinal fistula and repeated fever at postoperative 7 days with the highest temperature as 39.2 . This recipient had body temperature returned to normal and good function of the graft after treatment in the isolation ward with active drainage, and was transferred back to local hospital for further rehabilitation treatment. The duration of hospital stay of the 6 recipients were 30 days(range, 15-74 days). (5) Follow-up of liver transplant recipients: all the 6 recipients were followed up for 31.5 days(range, 12.0-64.0 days) with the normal body temperature, and they had negative results of viral pneumonia for chest CT examination and nucleic acid test for COVID-19. (6) Infection of medical staffs of liver transplantation: surgeons, nurses, anesthetists, medical staffs at ICU and medical staffs at liver transplantation center who participated in liver transplantation had good health within postoperative 14 days, without suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 risk assessment scale has good safety for liver transplant recipients during the COVID-19 outbreak. It is suggested that organ transplantation can be carried out in low-risk recipients and cautiously carried out in recipients of uncertain risk, but organ transplantation should not be carried out in high-risk recipients.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the emergency surgical strategies for patients with acute abdomen during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 20 patients with acute abdomen who were admitted to the Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 18, 2020 and February 10, 2020 were collected. There were 13 males and 7 females, aged from 25 to 82 years, with an average age of 57 years. All the patients with emergency surgeries received pulmonary computed tomography (CT) examination before surgery, and completed nucleic acid detection in throat swab if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent regular anesthesia, suspected and confirmed cases were selected a proper anesthesia based on their medical condition and surgical procedure. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, suspected and confirmed cases underwent emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations;(2) postoperative situations. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as average (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Result(s): (1) Surgical situations: of the 20 patients with acute abdomen, 16 patients were excluded from COVID-19, and 4 were not excluded. All the 20 patients underwent emergency abdominal surgeries successfully, of whom 2 received surgeries under epidural anesthesia (including 1 with open appendectomy, 1 with open repair of duodenal bulbar perforation), 18 received surgeries under general anesthesia (including 9 with laparoscopic repair of duodenal bulbar perforation, 3 with open partial enterectomy, 3 with laparoscopic appendectomy, 1 with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, 1 with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 1 with cholecystostomy). The operation time of patients was 32-194 minutes, with an average time of 85 minutes. The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 50-400 mL, with an average volume of 68 mL. (2) Postoperative situations: 16 patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively were treated in the private general ward postoperatively. One of the 16 patients had fever at the postoperative 5th day and was highly suspected of COVID-19 after an emergency follow-up of pulmonary CT showing multiple ground-glass changes in the lungs. The patient was promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment, and results of nucleic acid detection in throat swab showed double positive. Medical history described by the patient showed that the patient and family members were residents of Wuhan who were not isolated at home during the epidemic. There was no way to confirm whether they had a history of exposure to patients with COVID-19. Medical staffs involved in this case did not show COVID-19 related symptoms during 14 days of medical observation. The other 15 patients recovered well postoperatively. The 4 patients who were not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history and results of pulmonary CT examination were directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively. They were excluded from COVID-19 for two consecutive negative results of nucleic acid detection in the throat swab and recovered well. Two of the 20 patients with acute abdomen had postoperative complications. One had surgical incision infection and recovered after secondary closure following opening incision, sterilizing and dressing, the other one had intestinal leakage and was improved after conservative treatment by abdominal drainage. There was no death in the 20 patients with acute abdomen. Conclusion(s): Patients with acute abdomen need to be screened through emergency forward. Patients excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, and patients not excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. The temperature, blood routine test and other l boratory examinations are performed to monitor patients after operation, and the pulmonary CT and throat nucleic acid tests should be conducted if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively are treated in the private general ward postoperatively, and they should be promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment after being confirmed. Patients who are not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history should be directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the emergency surgical strategies for patients with acute abdomen during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 20 patients with acute abdomen who were admitted to the Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 18, 2020 and February 10, 2020 were collected. There were 13 males and 7 females, aged from 25 to 82 years, with an average age of 57 years. All the patients with emergency surgeries received pulmonary computed tomography (CT) examination before surgery, and completed nucleic acid detection in throat swab if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent regular anesthesia, suspected and confirmed cases were selected a proper anesthesia based on their medical condition and surgical procedure. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, suspected and confirmed cases underwent emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations;(2) postoperative situations. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as average (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Result(s): (1) Surgical situations: of the 20 patients with acute abdomen, 16 patients were excluded from COVID-19, and 4 were not excluded. All the 20 patients underwent emergency abdominal surgeries successfully, of whom 2 received surgeries under epidural anesthesia (including 1 with open appendectomy, 1 with open repair of duodenal bulbar perforation), 18 received surgeries under general anesthesia (including 9 with laparoscopic repair of duodenal bulbar perforation, 3 with open partial enterectomy, 3 with laparoscopic appendectomy, 1 with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, 1 with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 1 with cholecystostomy). The operation time of patients was 32-194 minutes, with an average time of 85 minutes. The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 50-400 mL, with an average volume of 68 mL. (2) Postoperative situations: 16 patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively were treated in the private general ward postoperatively. One of the 16 patients had fever at the postoperative 5th day and was highly suspected of COVID-19 after an emergency follow-up of pulmonary CT showing multiple ground-glass changes in the lungs. The patient was promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment, and results of nucleic acid detection in throat swab showed double positive. Medical history described by the patient showed that the patient and family members were residents of Wuhan who were not isolated at home during the epidemic. There was no way to confirm whether they had a history of exposure to patients with COVID-19. Medical staffs involved in this case did not show COVID-19 related symptoms during 14 days of medical observation. The other 15 patients recovered well postoperatively. The 4 patients who were not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history and results of pulmonary CT examination were directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively. They were excluded from COVID-19 for two consecutive negative results of nucleic acid detection in the throat swab and recovered well. Two of the 20 patients with acute abdomen had postoperative complications. One had surgical incision infection and recovered after secondary closure following opening incision, sterilizing and dressing, the other one had intestinal leakage and was improved after conservative treatment by abdominal drainage. There was no death in the 20 patients with acute abdomen. Conclusion(s): Patients with acute abdomen need to be screened through emergency forward. Patients excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, and patients not excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. The temperature, blood routine test and other l boratory examinations are performed to monitor patients after operation, and the pulmonary CT and throat nucleic acid tests should be conducted if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively are treated in the private general ward postoperatively, and they should be promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment after being confirmed. Patients who are not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history should be directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Common examples include catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical site infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections. Standardized infection control processes and precautions have been shown to reduce the rate of HAIs, and targeted practices for HAIs have shown further reductions. Patient safety tools have been developed for various HAIs to help guide administrators and are free for public use through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STRIVE (States Targeting Reduction in Infections via Engagement) initiative. The Choosing Wisely initiative makes best practice recommendations for physicians to improve quality of care and reduce costs;targeted recommendations were developed to reduce the risk of HAIs. For example, using invasive devices only when indicated and for the shortest time possible reduces the risk of device-related HAIs. The goal of antibiotic stewardship is to reduce C. difficile infections and further development of multidrug-resistant organisms such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic stewardship targets physician behaviors such as reviewing antibiotic therapy choices every 48 to 72 hours, reviewing culture results as soon as available, de-escalating antibiotic therapy when appropriate, and documenting the indications for initiating and continuing antibiotic therapy.Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Family Physicians.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Since the start of the COVID-9 pandemic, inpatient hospital resources have become extremely limited. This has limited access to surgical care for patients, especially for elective surgeries. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has been known to be very safe with very low rates of serious complications but has typically been accompanied with an inpatient hospital stay. Performing DBS surgery as an outpatient procedure could preserve access to this important treatment option, even during medical scarcity. Methods From March 2020 to January of 2021, stage I DBS surgery was scheduled as outpatient surgery for 19 patients. DBS patients who were scheduled as inpatient admissions were included as a comparison. Cohorts were compared based on time until discharge, early surgical complications, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, as well as demographic patient characteristics. Results Eighteen patients underwent a DBS scheduled as an outpatient surgery were compared to 20 patients who were scheduled as inpatient surgeries. Only 1 patient scheduled as an outpatient surgery was admitted overnight. This was due to an asymptomatic hemorrhage seen on routine post op imaging. There were no significant differences between readmissions, ED visits, or complications between the groups. In the outpatient surgery group, there were 2 post op ED visits and no admissions. There were no symptomatic hemorrhages, surgical site infections, readmissions, or reoperations in the outpatient group. The post op admission time for the two groups was 3.72h (+/-1.11) vs 26.83h (+/-3.49) (p<0.0001). Conclusion Outpatient DBS surgery does not result in increases in readmissions or emergency visits. This could allow increased availability of DBS surgery during times of medical scarcity and lower the economic barriers to DBS surgery..
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Post-COVID-19 Infection Complications SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/17/2022 12:15 pm - 01:15 pm INTRODUCTION: Aortitis is a type of vasculitis that refers to inflammation of the aortic wall. Most common causes are rheumatologic disorders and bacterial infection. Here, we report a viral cause of aortitis induced by COVID-19. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73 year old female with history of coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, COPD, hypertension, pulmonary embolism on Eliquis and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) status post repair presented with acute hypoxemia secondary to Covid-19 pneumonia. Of note, patient was vaccinated against COVID-19. CT abdomen at admission demonstrated a known infrarenal AAA with increased degree aortic wall thickening, concerning for aortitis. Aortitis was initially thought to be due to endovascular infection from possible bacteremia rather than surgical site infection as the patient had the AAA repair almost a year prior. Given that bacterial aortitis could result in death, blood cultures were obtained and she was started on Vancomycin and Rocephin. Rapid Plasma Reagin was ordered to rule out syphilis. She had titer of 1-2 which was thought to be false positive as fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test was negative. After blood cultures and inflammatory markers were negative, antibiotics were discontinued. Aortitis was attributed to COVID. Patient was treated with DEXA-ARDS protocol. Repeat CT abdomen after 8 days no longer showed gross evidence of aortitis. Patient was discharged home with home healthcare. DISCUSSION: Aortitis, a rare complication of COVID-19, has been reported. A proposed mechanism of this pathogenesis involves acute endotheliitis, where endothelial cells infected by virions become infiltrated by neutrophils and mononuclear cells, leading to apoptosis and lymphocytic endotheliitis [1]. Later, these arteries move through the stages of an accelerated karyolysis, accumulation of apoptotic bodies, caspase granules, and fibrinoid substances, leading to leukocytoclastic vasculitis [1]. This inflammatory reaction is followed by deposition of polyclonal antigen-antibody immune complexes, which is a type III hypersensitivity acute vasculitis [2]. Our patient's history of AAA repair predisposed her to increased endothelial dysfunction. After other bacterial infectious causes and post-surgical complications were ruled out, patient was treated with steroids. Most cases of COVID induced aortitis have been treated with prednisone that required treatment for around 1 month [3]. Here, we present a patient treated with DEXA-ARDS with resolution of aortitis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the novelty, the understanding of exact pathogenesis and long term effects of COVID-19 induced aortitis is limited. However, our case does serve to support prior case reports of COVID-19 aortitis that showed clinical and radiologic response to steroids. Further research is warranted to diagnose and treat aortitis in order to avoid life threating complications. Reference #1: Varga, Zsuzsanna, et al. "Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19.” The Lancet 395.10234 (2020): 1417-1418. Reference #2: Roncati, Luca, et al. "Type 3 hypersensitivity in COVID-19 vasculitis.” (2020): 108487-108489. Reference #3: Dhakal, Pravash et al. "Aortitis in COVID-19.” IDCases vol. 24 (2021): e01063. doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01063 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Jessica Lee No relevant relationships by Thong Ngo No relevant relationships by Marrian Sedrak No relevant relationships by Hena Yagnik
ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine if ketamine sedation is a safe and cost-effective way of treating paediatric patients presenting with nail bed injuries to the emergency department. Method:Aretrospective cohort study was carried out over a nine-month period in children between ages 18 months and 16 years old, presenting to the paediatric emergency department (PED) at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, with nail bed injuries requiring repair by the plastic surgery team. The primary outcome measures are complications at the time of sedation and at outpatient follow up including surgical site infection at seven days. A secondary outcome measure of parental satisfaction was collected at four months. A cost analysis comparison against procedures completed under general anaesthetic was also undertaken. Results: During the 9-month period, 10 nail bed repairs were performed under ketamine sedation in the PED. There were no serious adverse events recorded. No cases required further procedures and there were no cases of surgical site infections at 7 days. Parents reported favourable outcomes, with an average overall satisfaction score of 9.4 (where 10 is complete satisfaction). At follow up, there was one recorded complication which was successfully treated, with all patients being discharged from follow up within 3 months. Conclusion: This small study has shown ketamine procedural sedation in the paediatric population to be a safe and cost-effective method for the treatment of nail bed injuries in children presenting to PED. We believe that this management strategy, brought to the fore during the COVID-19 pandemic, should be considered as standard across all PEDs.
ABSTRACT
Aim: Rate of surgical site infections (SSI) in orthopaedic surgery is low but can have disastrous consequences. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Covid-19 measures on the rate of SSI and subsequent readmissions in orthopaedic patients. Method: Retrospective, observational study comparing rates of SSI in orthopaedic patients who underwent surgery prior to the Covid-19 lockdown versus that of patients who underwent surgery during the lockdown period. A total of 1151 patients were identified using electronic clinical records over two different time periods: 3 months pre Covid-19 lockdown (n=680) and 3 months during the Covid-19 lockdown (n=470). Patients were followed up for 1 year following their initial procedure. Primary outcome was readmission for SSI. Results: The most commonly performed procedures were arthroplasty and manipulation under anaesthesia with 119 in lockdown vs 101 non-lockdown (p=0.001). The readmission rate was higher in the lockdown group with 61 (13%) vs 44 (6.5%) in the non-lockdown group (p <0.001). However, the majority were due to other surgical complications such as dislocations. Interestingly, the SSI rates were very similar with 24 (5%) in lockdown vs 28 (4%) in non-lockdown (p=0.472). Twenty patients (4.2%) required a secondary procedure for their SSI in the lockdown group vs 24 (3.5%) in non-lockdown (p=0.381). Mortality rate was similar at 44 (9.3%) in lockdown vs 61 (9.0%;p=0.836). Conclusion: Whilst Covid-19 precautions were associated with higher readmission rates, there was no significant difference in rate of SSI between the two groups.
ABSTRACT
Objective: COVID-19 pandemic required optimization of hospital institutional flow, especially regarding the use of intensive care unit (ICU) beds. The aim of this study was to assess whether the individualization of the indication for postoperative recovery from pulmonary surgery in ICU beds was associated with more perioperative complications. Method: retrospective analysis of medical records of patients undergoing anatomic lung resections for cancer in a tertiary hospital. The sample was divided into: Group-I, composed of surgeries performed between March/2019 and February/2020, pre-pandemic, and Group-II, composed of surgeries performed between March/2020 and February/2021, pandemic period in Brazil. We analyzed demographic data, surgical risks, surgeries performed, postoperative complications, length of stay in the ICU and hospital stay. Preventive measures of COVID-19 were adopted in group-II. Results: 43 patients were included, 20 in group-I and 23 in group-II. The groups did not show statistical differences regarding baseline demographic variables. In group-I, 80% of the patients underwent a postoperative period in the ICU, compared to 21% in group-II. There was a significant difference when comparing the average length of stay in an ICU bed (46 hours in group-I versus 14 hours in group-II-p<0.001). There was no statistical difference regarding postoperative complications (p=0.44). Conclusions: the individualization of the need for ICU use in the immediate postoperative period resulted in an improvement in the institutional care flow during the COVID-19 pandemic, in a safe way, without an increase in surgical morbidity and mortality, favoring the maintenance of essential cancer treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the surgical volume, surgical outcomes, and the evolving role of gynecologic oncologists in peripartum hysterectomies (PPH). Methods: We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of PPH cases performed at our institution from June 1, 2014, to June 30, 2021. Clinical-pathologic information was ed into a REDCap database. All analyses were conducted using STATA 17. Results: A total of 109 cases were performed over the 7-year period. Gynecologic oncologists (GYO) involvement in the cases increased from 33% in 2014 to 80% in 2021. The mean age was 36 (range: 23-47) years. Most patients were White (81/109, 74.3%), and the median BMI was 30.7 (range: 21-57) kg/m2. Surgical indications included placenta accreta syndrome (PAS) in 84 (77%) cases, uterine atony in ten (9.2%), uterine rupture in three (2.8%), malignancy in five (4.6%), and hemorrhage other than atony in seven cases (6.4%). Intraoperative complications included bladder injury (or intentional dissection) in eight (7.3%), ureter injury in four (3.7%), vascular injury in three (2.8%), and femoral pseudoaneurysm in one (0.9%) of the cases. Postoperative complications included urinary tract infection in 11 (10.1%), nerve injury in one (0.9%), surgical site infection in 13 (11.2%), and venous thromboembolism in five (4.6%) cases. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) usage started in 2019 with one case followed by six cases in 2020 (31.6%) and 3/16 cases in the first half of 2020 (15.8%). A higher REBOA usage in 2020 corresponded with blood products shortages during the COVID crisis.[Formula presented] Conclusions: Overall volume and complexity of peripartum hysterectomy are increasing. This trend is likely driven by an increased incidence of placenta accreta syndrome cases. Gynecologic oncologists are increasingly delegated as primary surgeons in many institutions. Fellowship training programs should strongly consider training in peripartum hysterectomy for trainees.
ABSTRACT
CASE: A 69-year-old male smoker with stage 3b prostate cancer managed with abiraterone and prednisone, prior severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation, and history of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis presented with 3 days of anorexia, watery diarrhea, and left lower abdominal pain. Two weeks earlier he developed a mild dry cough without fever, dyspnea, or chest pain. There were no sick contacts or recent travel. He was afebrile, and initial routine chemistries and a complete blood count were unremarkable. An abdomino-pelvic CT revealed acute diverticulitis of the distal descending and sigmoid colon. A consolidation at the right lung base was also incidentally noted. Follow up imaging confirmed a multifocal pneumonia on chest Xray. Legionella antigen was detected in the urine. Metronidazole and levofloxacin were initiated with clinical improvement and the patient was discharged home to complete a 10-day course of antibiotics IMPACT/DISCUSSION: Legionella bacteria are gram negative organisms found widespread in soil and bodies of water including lakes, streams, and artificial reservoirs. Transmission is via inhalation of aerosols and a high innoculum is typically needed to cause infection. Host risk factors for infection include older age, impaired cellular immunity, smoking, male sex, and medical co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, renal, lung and cardiovascular disease. The two most commonly known syndromes associated with Legionella infection are Legionnaire's disease, a pneumonia occurring typically in the late summer or early autumn months (as in our patient), and Pontiac fever, an acute self- limited febrile illness. The mortality rate for hospitalized Legionnaire's is up to 10%. Extra-pulmonary manifestations are rare and can include skin and soft tissue infections, septic arthritis, endocarditis, myocarditis, peritonitis, pyelonephritis, meningitis, brain abscesses, and surgical site infections. The diagnosis of extra-pulmonary disease requires detection of Legionella at the affected site by culture or polymerase chain reaction. In the absence of a known local Legionella outbreak, our patient's age, sex, smoking status, and underlying immune suppression most likely increased his risk for this sporadic infection. We postulate that the acute diarrhea associated with Legionnaire's disease may have triggered inflammation of his diverticula or the acute diverticulitis was an extra-pulmonary manifestation. To our knowledge, we are the first to report a case of Legionnaire's disease presenting as acute diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: Legionnaire's is a typical disease with many atypical and extra-pulmonary presentations. We present a case of Legionnaire's disease masquerading as acute diverticulitis and urge timely consideration and testing for Legionella in at-risk patients presenting with predominantly GI symptoms and subtle or no respiratory complaints, as it can be life-saving.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is difficult to make a lace-up surgical mask fit tightly to the face with conventional wearing methods because of the strings' poor tension, resulting in some air flowing through the gap. We introduced two feasible new wearing methods and obtained satisfactory experimental results. METHODS: The wearing of surgical masks by staff was investigated through observation and interview in operation rooms. The required time to don, close-fitting rates, and satisfaction of the conventional method and the two new recommended methods were counted and compared, according to the subjects' experience. The differences between the three wearing methods on the microbial contamination of the sterile area were explored in a mock operation. RESULTS: In the subjects' experience, the close-fitting rates were 47.0%, 92.0% and 100.0% in the conventional, Three Knots, and Elastic Band groups, respectively (P<0.001); the satisfaction scores evaluated by numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 were 5.06 ± 2.22, 6.89 ± 1.86 and 7.10 ± 1.72, respectively (P<0.001); the required times were 14.32 ± 2.20, 25.76 ± 5.13 and 27.37 ± 5.11 s, respectively (P<0.001). In the mock operation, there were significant differences between the conventional and Three Knots groups (37.5 (13) vs 18 (8) cfu, P<0.001), as well as between the conventional and Elastic Band groups (37.5 (13) vs 17(10) cfu, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended new wearing methods had the advantages of closer fit, higher satisfaction rates, were more comfortable, and resulted in lower contamination of the sterile area; however, the recommended two methods required more time.